What was the difference? Aside from Cleveland's dearth of championships since the beginning of the Superbowl era I believe that the message James sent was framed properly and was what Cleveland area residents wanted to hear. That the best player in a sport had chosen to come to Cleveland because he wanted to. Framing was crucial in this case. Reporters may have told the story correctly but then attempted to place the decision to return within their idea of the appropriate context which may not have agreed with Lebron's motives. For example one might say that the only reason he chose to come back to Northeast Ohio was to make as much money as possible. While that may or may not be true, its not the way any athlete wants to be perceived (it's never about the money, right?). By addressing the fans directly in a close approximation of his own voice, James owned the message and delivered it well. Kill the fatted calf, the prodigal son has returned!
Downtown soaking it all in and ran into other LeBron revelers! #TheKingIsBack #GoCavs #CavsGoodKarma pic.twitter.com/SHcBBBazlE
— Roel Seballos (@DoUKnoTheRealTP) July 11, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment